Industry Studies Group Papers

The Industry Studies Group Paper provides a current analysis of the domestic and international industry capability to support the 2022 NSS and NDS, and government-private sector interactions that impact the national innovation and defense industrial base. Students demonstrate the ability to evaluate international industry that supports the national innovation and defense industrial bases; derive fact-based, analytical, and resource-informed policy recommendations; and communicate them in a compelling fashion. Students develop actionable and resource-informed policy recommendations to strengthen the national innovation and defense industrial bases.

The Antonelli Award

Major General Theodore Antonelli Award for Research & Writing Excellence, was established in 1993 by the ICAF/Eisenhower School Alumni Association. Major General Antonelli served in North Africa and Italy during World War II as well as later in Vietnam. He later became the highly regarded 13th commandant of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, from 1975 to 1978. This award recognizes the Industry Study Group Report that best reflects the standards of analytical excellence expected of the Industry Study Program and all Eisenhower School graduates. Apply the filter "Antonelli Award" to see each year's winning papers at the bottom of this page.

Featured Papers

Antonelli Award | Oct. 28, 2025

All Ahead Full: Revitalizing the U.S. Maritime Industrial Base

2025 Antonelli Award Winner-The United States has long depended on maritime power to safeguard national interests, drive economic growth, and maintain global influence. Central to this capability is the Maritime Industrial Base, a complex ecosystem

Antonelli Award | May 31, 2024

America Can Afford Survival A Capable U.S. Nuclear Security Enterprise i...

2024 Antonelli Award Winner: Great Power Competition (GPC) with two nuclear peers/near-peers is driving the United States to confront the realities of an aging nuclear weapons stockpile and production infrastructure, shrinking manufacturing base, and

Antonelli Award | May 30, 2023

Transforming the Defense Space Architecture with the Tools of the U.S. F...

2023 Antonelli Award Winner: The asymmetric advantage the United States has long enjoyed in space diminishes as adversaries threaten the space system architecture underlying that advantage. The U.S. space system architecture depends on large,

Filtered Returns

Results:
Tag: Land Domain

Land Combat Systems: Dec. 30, 2017

Land Combat Systems

The Land Combat Systems (LCS) industry, as part of the overall defense industry, is critical to the U.S. and partner nation’s defense security. For the purposes of this study, the industry is sub-categorized into two markets: Tactical Wheeled Vehicles (TWV), including Protected Vehicles (PV), and Combat Vehicles (CV). Tactical Wheeled Vehicles include light, medium, and heavy wheeled vehicles carrying personnel and equipment with a limited ability to carry weapons. Combat Vehicles include tracked and wheeled vehicles mainly used in a ground combat role. The purpose of studying the LCS industry is to analyze representative issues and dilemmas faced by firms, the Department of Defense (DoD), and the U.S. Government (USG). The LCS industry consists of a number of key domestic and international firms as well as government depot facilities. Within the TWV market firms often manufacture both commercial and military products, sometimes on the same assembly line. However, most firms in the CV market are solely military suppliers. Cyclic government demand is a key driver in the TWV and CV markets. In addition, government customers control many variables which directly impacts the success or failure of LCS programs and the respective success or failure of individual firms. Given the facts above and based upon the study team observations and analysis, the USG and DoD should consider expanding Foreign Military Sales (FMS) opportunities, updating logistical sustainment plans and practices, revising requirements generation and oversight of Science and Technology (S&T) and innovation, and consolidating efforts within the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). These changes will maximize efficiency, increase competition, incentivize innovation, and minimize cost while maintaining the optimum readiness level for the designated mission requirements.