Industry Studies Group Papers

The Industry Studies Group Paper provides a current analysis of the domestic and international industry capability to support the 2022 NSS and NDS, and government-private sector interactions that impact the national innovation and defense industrial base. Students demonstrate the ability to evaluate international industry that supports the national innovation and defense industrial bases; derive fact-based, analytical, and resource-informed policy recommendations; and communicate them in a compelling fashion. Students develop actionable and resource-informed policy recommendations to strengthen the national innovation and defense industrial bases.

The Antonelli Award

Major General Theodore Antonelli Award for Research & Writing Excellence, was established in 1993 by the ICAF/Eisenhower School Alumni Association. Major General Antonelli served in North Africa and Italy during World War II as well as later in Vietnam. He later became the highly regarded 13th commandant of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, from 1975 to 1978. This award recognizes the Industry Study Group Report that best reflects the standards of analytical excellence expected of the Industry Study Program and all Eisenhower School graduates. Apply the filter "Antonelli Award" to see each year's winning papers at the bottom of this page.

Featured Papers

Antonelli Award | Oct. 28, 2025

All Ahead Full: Revitalizing the U.S. Maritime Industrial Base

2025 Antonelli Award Winner-The United States has long depended on maritime power to safeguard national interests, drive economic growth, and maintain global influence. Central to this capability is the Maritime Industrial Base, a complex ecosystem

Antonelli Award | May 31, 2024

America Can Afford Survival A Capable U.S. Nuclear Security Enterprise i...

2024 Antonelli Award Winner: Great Power Competition (GPC) with two nuclear peers/near-peers is driving the United States to confront the realities of an aging nuclear weapons stockpile and production infrastructure, shrinking manufacturing base, and

Antonelli Award | May 30, 2023

Transforming the Defense Space Architecture with the Tools of the U.S. F...

2023 Antonelli Award Winner: The asymmetric advantage the United States has long enjoyed in space diminishes as adversaries threaten the space system architecture underlying that advantage. The U.S. space system architecture depends on large,

Filtered Returns

Results:
Category: Defense Resource Management

Defense Resource Management (Formerly Human Capital) Sept. 18, 2025

Defense Resource Management

The originally designated Defense Resource Management Industry Study assumed responsibility for examining the varied and complex network of actors, processes, legal and regulatory mechanisms, and perspectives that converge at the intersection of resource management (availability, distribution, application), economic performance, and security. At the outset, it became clear that, broadly labeled, Defense Resource Management was not a definable industry with a coherent identity, even though it could be said to share certain important characteristics in common with industry: revenues, markets, customers/clientele, products (goods and services), processes, enterprises (installations and facilities), and workforces, among others. In a deeper sense, it was seen as what some would call a cross-cutting domain consisting of actors/stakeholders, relationships, policies, processes, and practices – basically an enabler or facilitator for all organizations and institutions, military and non-military, public and private. Within this larger set of parameters, the Defense Resource Management Industry Study therefore chose to focus its attention, energies, and activities more specifically on Strategic Human Capital, a richer and more comprehensive concept that both complements and stands independent of financial capital and physical capital. The overarching aim of this more-specifically-focused Industry Study enterprise has become to assess the importance and impact of human capital in contributing to and determining U.S. and international industrial and economic competitiveness (across industries, firms, and countries; for both defense and non-defense purposes; under routine and emergency circumstances). What has resulted is a reaffirmation that strategic human capital’s strength is its centrality in ensuring national security, contributing to economic vitality and competitiveness, and enabling the effective exercise of national power; conversely, its absence can almost inevitably and invariably produce vulnerability across virtually every societal domain.